Philosophers and Kings: Response to William Bridges
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Jürgen Schmidhuber Philosophers & Futurists , Catch Up ! Response to The Singularity
Responding to Chalmers’ The Singularity (2010), I argue that progress towards self-improving AIs is already substantially beyond what many futurists and philosophers are aware of. Instead of rehashing well-trodden topics of the previous millennium, let us start focusing on relevant new millennium results. All indented paragraphs of this paper are quotes taken from Chalmers’ paper of 2010, who m...
متن کاملObjections to hospital philosophers.
Like morally sensitive hospital staff, philosophers resist routine simplification of morally complex cases. Like hospital clergy, they favour reflective and principled decision-making. Like hospital lawyers, they refine and extend the language we use to formulate and defend our complex decisions. But hospital philosophers are not redundant: they have a wider range of principles and categories a...
متن کاملResponse to Comments of William B Hillegass
Impact of on-site cardiac catheterization on resource utilization and fatal and non-fatal outcomes after Title: acute myocardial infarction
متن کاملOn the 3-kings and 4-kings in multipartite tournaments
Koh and Tan gave a sufficient condition for a 3-partite tournament to have at least one 3-king in [K.M. Koh, B.P. Tan, Kings in multipartite tournaments, Discrete Math. 147 (1995) 171–183, Theorem 2]. In Theorem 1 of this paper, we extend this result to n-partite tournaments, where n 3. In [K.M. Koh, B.P. Tan, Number of 4-kings in bipartite tournaments with no 3-kings, Discrete Math. 154 (1996)...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: History of Humanities
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2379-3163,2379-3171
DOI: 10.1086/701983